Effects of presession pairing on challenging behavior and academic responding for children with autism / by Amanda N. Kelly.

As a result of pairing with work demands, the presence of an instructor may signal a worsening set of aversive conditions (i.e., reflexive conditioned motivating operation; CMO-R). The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of presession pairing of the instructor with preferred stimuli on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: View Online
Main Author: Kelly, Amanda N. (Author)
Format: Thesis Book
Language:English
Subjects:
LEADER 03488nam a2200373Ii 4500
001 b2272140
003 CaEvIII
005 20190521123300.0
008 190521s2013 maum mb b000 0 eng d
035 |a (OCoLC)1101970261 
040 |a SCL  |b eng  |c SCL 
049 |a SCLL 
050 4 |a RJ506.A9 K45 2013 
100 1 |a Kelly, Amanda N.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Effects of presession pairing on challenging behavior and academic responding for children with autism /  |c by Amanda N. Kelly. 
264 0 |a [Boston, Massachusetts] :  |b Simmons University,  |c 2013. 
300 |a 81 pages ;  |c 28 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
502 |b Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis.  |c Simmons University,  |d 2013. 
504 |a Bibliography: pages 62-72. 
520 3 |a As a result of pairing with work demands, the presence of an instructor may signal a worsening set of aversive conditions (i.e., reflexive conditioned motivating operation; CMO-R). The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of presession pairing of the instructor with preferred stimuli on disruptive behavior and correct academic responding. Functional analyses indicated a primary or combined escape function for three children diagnosed with autism. For participants with multiply-maintained challenging behavior, attention was a co-occurring function. Preference assessments were completed to identify preferred items for each participant. The discrete-trial-training used to teach math and spelling skills was the same across the baseline and presession pairing sessions. In the presession pairing phase, the investigator engaged playfully with the participant with a highly preferred item for 2-4 minutes immediately before the instructional session. Results in a multiple baseline across participants design indicated that presession pairing was effective in reducing disruptive behaviors and increasing inter-response times of challenging behaviors. Results also indicated that presession pairing had little effect (either positive or negative) on the percentage of correct academic responses. In the context of discrete trial teaching, presession pairing was an effective antecedent procedure that increased opportunities for reinforcement and reduced self-injurious behavior, aggression, property destruction, and negative statements related to task demands. When challenging behaviors occurred in presession pairing conditions, many occurred during error correction procedures. Future researchers should investigate the effects of errorless teaching procedures in conjunction with presession pairing. Future researchers should also replicate presession pairing procedures and continue investigating its mechanism by directly testing the reinforcing value of the adult paired with strong reinforcers. 
650 0 |a Autism in children. 
650 0 |a Autistic children  |x Behavior modification. 
655 7 |a Academic theses.  |2 lcgft 
690 |a Simmons University authors. Kelly, Amanda N. 
856 4 0 |u http://beatleyweb.simmons.edu/scholar/items/show/183  |y View Online 
907 |a .b2272140x  |b 190510  |c 200605 
913 |a o 
945 |g 1  |j 0  |l arc   |o -  |p $0.00  |q    |r    |s a  |t 0  |u 0  |v 0  |w 0  |x 0  |y .i20670199  |z 190521 
998 |a arc  |b 190510  |c m  |d b  |e o  |f eng  |g mau  |h 0 
999 f f |i df597416-a997-11ea-8da7-1466fadbd8b9  |s fba3915a-7ae6-4ce4-9e64-1fe65f8b2aa6 
852 |b Archives (Library Use Only)  |h RJ506.A9 K45 2013  |0 063f0fa4-a99e-11ea-b550-3a67fadbd8b9